REAL ID Online Application — Usability Evaluation & UX Recommendations

REAL ID Online Application — Usability Evaluation & UX Recommendations

REAL ID Online Application — Usability Evaluation & UX Recommendations

Improved Mercer University’s Skelton Primo library interface by identifying usability barriers and recommending redesigns that reduced user abandonment.

Improved Mercer University’s Skelton Primo library interface by identifying usability barriers and recommending redesigns that reduced user abandonment.

Usability Testing

Higher Education

Search Experience

Search Experience

Interaction Design

Interaction Design

Academic Library UX

Academic Library UX

Role

UX/UI Researcher

Industry

Education

Duration

3 months

Overview

REAL ID is a national initiative requiring citizens to verify identity for secure facility access and domestic air travel. DHS requested a usability evaluation of the online REAL ID information and application flow to identify friction points and improve user clarity.

I led a moderated usability study and delivered five high‑impact UX recommendations aimed at reducing user confusion, clarifying documentation requirements, and improving navigation flows.


High-Level Outcomes:

  • Identified 11 critical usability issues

  • Delivered 5 actionable UX improvements

  • Improved clarity around documentation preparation

  • Reduced common friction points that contribute to task abandonment

Overview

Skelton Library’s Primo interface is a central tool for students searching for articles, books, and digital resources. Despite being widely adopted across academic systems, the interface often presents usability challenges for novice users. A team of myself and two other team members conducted a usability study and proposed UX improvements to enhance discoverability, search clarity, and task efficiency.


High-Level Outcomes:

  • Identified top usability barriers related to search filters and terminology

  • Proposed IA and interaction design enhancements for clearer navigation

  • Improved student ability to complete common academic research tasks

Business Problem


Students frequently struggle with locating materials on the current Primo interface. This results in:


  • Inefficient research workflows

  • Overreliance on librarian assistance

  • Missed or overlooked resources


Business Objective: Enhance the search experience so students can independently and efficiently locate resources with minimal friction.

Research Questions


  • Can students locate and use advanced search features effectively?

  • Are filters, labels, and categories intuitive for academic research tasks?

  • Which parts of the interface cause hesitation or repeated errors?

  • Is the navigation structure aligned with students’ mental models?

Business Problem


DHS observed high user error rates and incomplete application attempts, leading to:


  • Increased support calls

  • Frequent in‑person rework at DMVs

  • Lower compliance with REAL ID requirements


Business Objective: Reduce user errors and process abandonment to improve compliance and reduce operational burden across state agencies.

Research Questions


  • Can users understand the documentation requirements?

  • Does the navigation structure guide users effectively through the process?

  • Which pages contain friction or confusion that hinder task completion?

  • How do first‑time applicants interpret labels, page structure, and instructions?

Industry

Government Service

My Role

UX/UI Researcher

Organization

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

[Timeline]

January 2021 - March 2021

Research Methods

Approach: Moderated usability testing and comparative analysis
Participants: 5 Faculty/Staff Members at Mercer University

Tasks Observed:

  • Searching for a known article

  • Using filters to narrow search results

  • Accessing full-text materials

  • Locating physical resources


Artifacts Produced:

  • Test Plan & Script

  • Observation Notes

  • Formal Usability Report (for client)

  • Presentation (for client)

Figure 1: Script/tasklist for usability testing

Research Methods

Approach: Moderated usability testing + heuristic evaluation
Participants: 5 first-time REAL ID microsite visitors; Mercer Faculty & Family Relatives between the ages of 40-65.
Tools: Zoom

Tasks Observed:

  • Locating REAL ID information

  • Identifying required documents

  • Beginning the application process

  • Attempting a test submission

Artifacts Produced:

  • Usability Test Plan

  • Moderation Script

  • Observation Notes

  • Severity Ratings

  • Recommendations Report

  • Formal Usability Report (for client)

  • Presentation (for client)

Figure 1: Script/tasklist for usability testing

Key Findings


A. Terminology Confusion

Participants struggled with technical labels such as “Proof of Identity” and “Primary vs. Secondary Documents.” Misinterpretations led to incorrect document selection or skipped requirements.

B. Navigation & Page Layout

Important steps were placed below the fold, making it difficult for users to know where to start. Users often scrolled past essential instructions.

C. Ineffective Visual Hierarchy

Dense text blocks and equal‑weighted elements made it hard for users to recognize the important next step.

Key Findings


A. Terminology Confusion

Participants struggled with technical labels such as “Proof of Identity” and “Primary vs. Secondary Documents.” Misinterpretations led to incorrect document selection or skipped requirements.

B. Navigation & Page Layout

Important steps were placed below the fold, making it difficult for users to know where to start. Users often scrolled past essential instructions.

C. Ineffective Visual Hierarchy

Dense text blocks and equal‑weighted elements made it hard for users to recognize the important next step.

Key Findings


A. Filter and Label Confusion

Users misunderstood filter terminology such as Availability, Resource Type, and Full Text Online.


B. Overloaded Search Results Page

The page hierarchy did not clearly distinguish primary actions from secondary ones, causing scanning fatigue.


C. Navigation Disconnects

Participants struggled to locate essential actions like saving, exporting, or accessing advanced options.


Figure 2: Examples of label issues that users encountered

UX Recommendations

1. Clarify Filter Terminology with Plain Language

Replace ambiguous labels with task-oriented language.


2. Introduce a Results Page Visual Hierarchy

Distinguish primary actions (download, open, view) from secondary ones.


3. Combine Related Filters

Grouping filters reduces cognitive load and scannability issues.


4. Improve Advanced Search Entry Points

Ensure advanced options are easy to locate and clearly signposted.


5. Add Quick-Start Guidance for New Users

Brief contextual tooltips or short guides support novice researchers.



UX Recommendations

1. Clarify Filter Terminology with Plain Language

Replace ambiguous labels with task-oriented language.


2. Introduce a Results Page Visual Hierarchy

Distinguish primary actions (download, open, view) from secondary ones.


3. Combine Related Filters

Grouping filters reduces cognitive load and scannability issues.


4. Improve Advanced Search Entry Points

Ensure advanced options are easy to locate and clearly signposted.


5. Add Quick-Start Guidance for New Users

Brief contextual tooltips or short guides support novice researchers.



Impact

Expected improvements include:


  • Increased search success rates

  • Reduced dependency on library staff for basic tasks

  • Faster discovery of relevant materials

  • More intuitive filtering and navigation for novice users



Reflection

Key lessons from this case study include recognizing that:


  • Academic platforms require balancing complexity with clarity.

  • Small changes to filter language dramatically improve usability.

  • Students benefit from guided search pathways when learning new systems.



Reflection

Key lessons from this case study include recognizing that:


  • Academic platforms require balancing complexity with clarity.

  • Small changes to filter language dramatically improve usability.

  • Students benefit from guided search pathways when learning new systems.



Future Opportunities/Areas of Improvement

There were a couple of limitations/areas of improvement that I identified during the study, as well potential suggestions for said limitations:


  • Limited time for usability testing

    • Suggestion: In retrospection, it would have been much more advantageous for each member of the team to conduct their own usability tests. This could increase the number of tests conducted and the amount of data collected.


  • Recruitment of Participants

    • Suggestion: In correlation with the limited amount of time that we had to conduct usability testing, our recruitment process was very sporadic, leaving us with very limited number of people to recruit. In the perfect scenario, I would implement the use of LinkedIn and UserTesting to broaden the search.

Impact

Expected improvements include:


  • Increased search success rates

  • Reduced dependency on library staff for basic tasks

  • Faster discovery of relevant materials

  • More intuitive filtering and navigation for novice users



Reflection

Key lessons from this case study include recognizing that:


  • Academic platforms require balancing complexity with clarity.

  • Small changes to filter language dramatically improve usability.

  • Students benefit from guided search pathways when learning new systems.



Future Opportunities/Areas of Improvement

There were a few limitations/areas of improvement that I identified during the study, as well potential fixes for said limitations


  • Limited time for usability testing

    • Suggestion: In retrospection, it would have been much more advantageous for each member of the team to conduct their own usability tests. This could increase the number of tests conducted and the amount of data collected.


  • Recruitment of Participants

    • Suggestion: In correlation with the limited amount of time that we had to conduct usability testing, our recruitment process was very sporadic, leaving us with very limited number of people to recruit. In the perfect scenario, I would implement the use of LinkedIn and UserTesting to broaden the search.

Jeremiah Pulliam

Copyright © 2025 by Jeremiah Pulliam

Other Projects

Jeremiah Pulliam

Copyright © 2025 by Jeremiah Pulliam

Jeremiah Pulliam

Copyright © 2025 by Jeremiah Pulliam

Jeremiah Pulliam

Copyright © 2025 by Jeremiah Pulliam